Naurizbaeva Gulayim Sarsenbaevna

Authors

Naurizbaeva Gulayim Sarsenbaevna Assistant-teacher of Karakalpak State University, Uzbekistan

Keywords:

Parliamentary oversight, institutional accountability, legislative control

Abstract

This article is devoted to an in-depth comparative analysis of oversight mechanisms in two leading democratic models of the world — the United States, which has a presidential system based on the separation of powers, and the United Kingdom, which operates under a parliamentary system characterized by the fusion of powers. Based on the results of this analysis, scientifically grounded recommendations are developed to further improve parliamentary oversight in Uzbekistan.

References

Mikael Holmgren, Carl Dahlström – Parliamentary Control of Ministerial Policymaking. 2024. https://www.gu.se/sites/default/files/2024-09/2024_8_Holmgren_Dahlstrom.pdf

Comparative Approaches UK and USA. https://sites.google.com/site/thepoliticsteacherorg/comparative-approaches-uk-and-usa

Garvey, Todd; Oleszek, Mark J.; Wilhelm, Ben – Federal Government Management & Organization; Law, Constitution & Civil Liberties. 2024. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF10015

Cole, Jared P.; Garvey, Todd – Impeachment and the Constitution. 2023. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R46013

House of Commons – Select Committees. 2011. https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/commons-information-office/brief-guides/select-committees.pdf