Semantic Types Of Kinship Terms In Korean And Uzbek: A Comparative Analysis

Authors

  • Musaev Farhod Mansurovich Independent researcher, Urgench Statate university named after Abu Rayhan Biruni, Khorezm, Uzbekistan

Keywords:

Kinship terms, semantics, Korean language

Abstract

Kinship terminology reflects cultural values and worldviews, yet comparative studies between Korean and Uzbek languages remain limited. This research classifies and compares semantic types of kinship terms in both languages through comparative-semantic and componential analysis using dictionary sources, ethnographic texts, and folklore materials. While both languages share core kinship concepts, they exhibit distinct semantic organization patterns. Korean displays fine-grained distinctions with 172 terms featuring elaborate hierarchical systems reflecting Confucian values, including speaker-gender sensitivity and systematic formality levels. Uzbek demonstrates broader categorical coverage with 132 terms emphasizing community integration and Islamic traditions. Korean employs hierarchical precision encoding multiple relationship dimensions simultaneously, while Uzbek utilizes integrative flexibility prioritizing social function over categorical distinctions. The analysis confirms that kinship terminology functions as cultural code where linguistic expression is shaped by religious, philosophical, and social traditions rather than universal biological categories alone.

References

Berlin, Brent, and Paul Kay. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. University of California Press, 1969.

Cho, Hyun-Sook. Korean Kinship Terminology and Social Structure. Seoul National University Press, 2007.

Comrie, Bernard. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, 1989.

D'Andrade, Roy G. "Procedures for Predicting Kinship Terminologies from Features of Social Organization." Explorations in Mathematical Anthropology, edited by Paul Kay, MIT Press, 1971, pp. 60-75.

Duranti, Alessandro. Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Goodenough, Ward H. "Componential Analysis and the Study of Meaning." Language, vol. 32, no. 1, 1956, pp. 195-216.

Korean Language Institute. Standard Korean Language Dictionary (표준국어대사전). National Institute of Korean Language, 2019.

Lounsbury, Floyd G. "A Semantic Analysis of the Pawnee Kinship Usage." Language, vol. 32, no. 1, 1956, pp. 158-194.

Murdock, George Peter. Social Structure. Macmillan, 1949.

Nazarov, Botir. Uzbek Family Traditions and Kinship Terminology. Tashkent University Press, 2018.

Romney, A. Kimball, and Roy G. D'Andrade. "Cognitive Aspects of English Kin Terms." American Anthropologist, vol. 66, no. 3, 1964, pp. 146-170.

Schneider, David M. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. University of Michigan Press, 1984.

Tajiev, Yusuf. O'zbek Oila An'analari va Qarindoshlik Terminologiyasi [Uzbek Family Traditions and Kinship Terminology]. O'zbekiston Milliy Universiteti, 2017.

Uzbekistan Academy of Sciences. O'zbek Tilining Izohli Lug'ati [Explanatory Dictionary of the Uzbek Language]. Fan Publishing, 2016.

Wierzbicka, Anna. Semantics, Culture, and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations. Oxford University Press, 1992.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-31